Create Exam Questions from Contemporary Music: Sample Test Items Using Mitski’s Lead Single

Hook: Turn tight deadlines into reliable, high-quality listening exams using a single contemporary track

If you coach students to succeed on listening exams or design music criticism assessments, you already know the pressure: tight deadlines, inconsistent student preparation, and the demand for measurable learning outcomes. Using a single contemporary song as a test prompt solves many of those problems — and Mitski’s 2026 lead single “Where’s My Phone?” is an ideal case study. This guide gives ready-to-use multiple-choice, short-answer, and essay questions — plus rubrics, answer keys, and practical tips for 2026 testing environments (AI grading, spatial audio, hybrid classrooms).

The fast take: Why use a contemporary song like Mitski’s in 2026 listening exams?

Inverted-pyramid first: contemporary songs increase engagement and real-world relevance, allow for multidimensional assessment (ear training, harmonic analysis, lyric interpretation, cultural context), and integrate modern listening practices (streaming, short-form virality, streaming-driven snippets).

• Relevance: Students recognize Mitski and engage with genre-blurring material.
• Multimodality: The song and its video allow simultaneous testing of sonic, textual, and visual analysis.
• Scalability: Mix objective and subjective items to streamline grading with AI while preserving instructor judgment on essays.

Context (2026): What makes "Where's My Phone?" a timely test prompt?

Mitski’s 2026 single launched a narrative-heavy album campaign tied to The Haunting of Hill House motifs and a viral interactive marketing strategy (mysterious phone line and microsite). The track’s production and release reflect several 2025–2026 trends instructors should know:

• Narrative-driven albums: Artists increasingly craft multimedia narratives; assessment can require intertextual analysis (literature references, marketing artifacts).
• Spatial audio: More releases appear in Dolby Atmos and other immersive mixes; listening exams can examine pan, depth, and spatial cues.
• AI-assisted grading tools: In 2026, many instructors use AI for objective item scoring and initial essay feedback — but human rubrics remain essential for nuanced critique.
• Short-form virality: TikTok and short clips make motif recognition crucial; students should identify hooks that travel best on social platforms.

Test-design principles before you use the prompts

Before deploying any of these items, align them with course outcomes. Use Bloom’s taxonomy: ensure you have lower-level objective items (identify, recall) and higher-level subjective items (analyze, evaluate, create). Follow accessibility best practices: provide transcripts, alt media, and extended time. Plan for academic integrity in remote settings by randomized item banks and variant audio clips.

Practical setup options

• In-class listening lab: Play the full song once, then provide short repeated excerpts for specific items.
• Hybrid take-home with proctoring: Provide a time-limited streaming link and require webcam-enabled proctoring or ephemeral AI workspaces for secure test playback.
• Untimed analytical exam: Give the audio, transcript, and video; allow longer synthesis essays suitable for capstone assessment.

Multiple-choice questions (listening & theory)

Designed for automatic grading. Each item includes the correct answer and a brief explanation for instructors.

MCQ Set A — Basic listening (ear-training)

1. Which of the following best describes the overall meter of “Where’s My Phone?”?

   • a) 4/4 (common time)
   • b) 3/4 (waltz)
   • c) Alternating 4/4 and 3/4
   • d) Free meter

   Answer: a) 4/4 — the groove is steady and emphasizes backbeat placement typical of contemporary indie/pop.

2. The song opens with a prominent synth texture in which register?

   • a) Sub-bass
   • b) Midrange pad
   • c) High shimmer/air
   • d) Low-mid arpeggio

   Answer: b) Midrange pad — the opening creates atmosphere in middle frequencies before the vocal enters.

3. Which harmonic device does Mitski use in the chorus to heighten tension?

   • a) Picardy third
   • b) Modal mixture (borrowed chord)
   • c) Simple tonic-dominant loop
   • d) Bitonal layering

   Answer: b) Modal mixture — brief borrowed chords add color and emotional complexity.

MCQ Set B — Critical listening and production

1. Which mixing choice most contributes to the song’s intimate but unsettling mood?

   • a) Heavy reverb on vocals
   • b) Close-miked dry vocal with distant ambi reverb
   • c) Compression-heavy sidechain on the bass
   • d) Prominent autotune as an effect

   Answer: b) Close-miked dry vocal with distant ambi reverb — creates immediacy with ghostly space behind it.

2. Which production trend from 2025–26 is demonstrated in the track?

   • a) Return to pure analog tape saturation
   • b) Use of spatial audio elements for depth
   • c) Maximum loudness mastering (brickwall)
   • d) Silence as the primary compositional tool

   Answer: b) Use of spatial audio elements — immersive mixing cues are present in modern singles, including Mitski’s releases.

Short-answer prompts (20–50 words each)

These assess concise analytical ability and recall. Use rubrics that allocate points for accuracy, specificity, and use of musical vocabulary.

1. Identify two motifs in the first 45 seconds and explain their expressive role.

   Model answer: A descending synth figure that evokes unsettlement and a repeated percussive click that mimics a phone’s absence; together they set an anxious tone tied to the song’s title.

2. Describe how dynamics change from verse to chorus and why that matters for textual emphasis.

   Model answer: The chorus features a modest dynamic lift with added harmonic padding, emphasizing the lyrical question and shifting the emotional center from introspection to outward plea.

3. In one sentence, explain how the song’s reference to Shirley Jackson (via campaign materials) can alter lyrical interpretation.

   Model answer: The intertextual reference frames the lyrics within domestic dread and psychological haunting, encouraging readings of isolation and unreliable perception.

Essay prompts (brief and extended)

Use these for higher-order evaluation. Provide clear rubrics that separate organization, evidence, musical analysis, and argument strength.

Short essay (500–700 words)

Prompt: Analyze the relationship between production choices and lyrical themes in “Where’s My Phone?”. Use specific timestamps and musical examples.

Rubric (20 points):

• Thesis clarity (4 pts)
• Use of timestamps and musical specifics (6 pts)
• Integration of lyrical analysis (4 pts)
• Organization and grammar (3 pts)
• Original insight or contextualization (3 pts)

Extended essay (1,200–1,500 words)

Prompt: Evaluate “Where’s My Phone?” in the context of Mitski’s broader artistic trajectory and contemporary indie-pop production trends (2020–2026). Discuss narrative marketing (the phone line and Shirley Jackson quote), the song’s sonic choices, and cultural reception. Argue whether the single represents continuity or a rupture in Mitski’s oeuvre.

Grading guidance: Expect synthesis of biography, intertextuality, sonic analysis, and cultural critique. Allocate points for evidentiary support (citations of interviews, reviews, or marketing artifacts), and penalize unsupported generalizations.

Sample high-scoring thesis excerpt (model answer snapshot)

Mitski’s “Where’s My Phone?” uses intimate vocal mixing and modal harmonic inflection to translate domestic anxiety into a compact pop form; its marketing’s Shirley Jackson nod reframes the song as psychological horror in miniature, continuing Mitski’s pattern of coupling interior vulnerability with cinematic affect while expanding her toolkit into immersive production techniques popularized in 2024–26.

Rubrics and scoring templates (for instructors)

Provide clear criteria to speed grading and maintain fairness.

Sample rubric for essays (scale 0–100)

• Introduction & thesis (15 pts) — Is the argument clear and original?
• Musical analysis (25 pts) — Are harmonic, melodic, rhythmic, and production details accurate and precise?
• Context & evidence (20 pts) — Does the essay use marketing materials, critical reception, and artist history accurately?
• Argument & synthesis (25 pts) — Does the essay synthesize music and cultural analysis into a coherent judgment?
• Mechanics & citations (15 pts) — Is the prose clear, and are sources cited (including the Mitski campaign or reviews)?

Answer key & explanations for instructors

Provide this when sharing MCQ and short-answer sections.

• MCQ Set A: 1a, 2b, 3b — expect short instructor notes on how to discuss any ambiguous student responses.
• MCQ Set B: 1b, 2b — tie these to demonstrated production features (reverb placement, stereo imaging).
• Short answers: look for technical terms (phrase, motif, register, timbre) and precise timestamps when possible.

Designing fair, secure, and accessible listening exams in 2026

With AI and remote proctoring common, consider these actionable tips:

1. Randomize audio excerpts and question order to reduce sharing of answers.
2. Provide accommodations: transcripts, extended time, and separate rooms for students with sensory needs.
3. Use AI for triage: Employ automated scoring for MCQs and initial essay feedback, but always perform a human review for subjective marks.
4. Validate listening environment: For remote exams, require a 360° webcam scan or use institutional proctoring platforms; alternatively, invite students on campus to a supervised lab.
5. Version control: Create multiple variants of short-answer prompts (same learning outcomes) to reduce memo-sharing.

Adapting questions for different course levels

Scale the cognitive demands depending on the course:

• Introductory: Focus on identification (meter, instrumentation, mood) and short interpretive answers.
• Intermediate: Ask for harmonic analysis, formal structure, and evidence-based interpretation.
• Advanced & graduate: Require archival research, reception history, intertextuality (e.g., Shirley Jackson reference), and engagement with contemporary scholarship on digital music economies (2024–26).

Classroom activity ideas to prepare students

Use these formative tasks to prepare students for the types of items above:

1. Guided listening worksheet: 8–10 timed checkpoints with prompts for motif identification and timestamped evidence.
2. Production lab: Isolate stems (if available) or recreate a texture (vocal + pad) in a DAW to understand mixing decisions.
3. Context seminar: Analyze Mitski’s marketing (phone line, site copy) and the Shirley Jackson quote; debate authorial intent vs. audience interpretation.
4. Peer-review: Students draft short essays and swap rubrics, using AI tools for grammar but human feedback for interpretive depth.
5. Bring in a portable AV kit for a listening lab demo to show playback differences across setups.

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

• Avoid overly narrow timestamps that hinge on inaudible micro-details; focus on salient events.
• Don’t conflate popularity with artistic value — encourage evidence-based analysis.
• Be explicit about acceptable sources (e.g., interviews, official marketing materials, credible reviews) for essay citations.

Why this approach improves learning outcomes

Using a contemporary single like Mitski’s allows students to practice transferable skills: close listening, informed argumentation, and contextual research. Instructors can measure both technical listening proficiency and critical thinking — essential competencies for music majors, educators, and lifelong learners. The approach also mirrors industry practice; 2026 employers value artists and analysts who can discuss sonic detail alongside cultural strategy.

Further reading and resources (2024–2026 context)

Recommended instructor resources to contextualize the single in class:

• Rolling Stone coverage of Mitski’s 2026 single and album campaign (for press framing)
• Recent articles on spatial audio adoption in streaming platforms (2024–26)
• Pedagogical studies on listening skills and AI-assisted assessment (2025–26 education journals)

Final actionable checklist for instructors

1. Select exam format (in-class vs. take-home) and align to outcomes.
2. Choose or edit MCQ/short-answer/essay items from this guide to the level of your course.
3. Create two or three variant versions for security and fairness.
4. Prepare rubrics and model answers for consistent grading.
5. Inform students of accessibility options and provide practice materials (guided listening worksheets).

Closing: Start building your Mitski-based exam today

Contemporary music prompts like Mitski’s “Where’s My Phone?” let you assess a full range of musical and critical skills while keeping students engaged. Use the MCQs for quick diagnostics, short answers for precise listening checks, and essays to evaluate interpretive sophistication. Want a downloadable exam packet or a sample rubric formatted for your LMS? Click through to get editable templates, stem-isolation exercises, and AI-grading tips tailored to 2026 classrooms.

Call to action: Visit our test-prep resources page to download free exam templates and a complete instructor packet based on this article — ready for immediate integration into your syllabus.

Related Reading

• Building a Desktop LLM Agent Safely: Sandboxing, Isolation and Auditability
• Future Formats: Why Micro‑Documentaries Will Dominate Short‑Form in 2026
• Hands-On: Studio Capture Essentials for Evidence Teams
• Live-Stream SOP: Cross-Posting Twitch Streams to Emerging Social Apps
• How to Price Domains for Enterprise Buyers Worried About Reliability
• Could Aviation Parts Failures Spark a Metals Rally? Lessons from the UPS Plane Investigation
• Smart Lighting on a Budget: The Govee RGBIC Lamp vs. Regular Desk Lamps
• Agent hunting for renters: what to ask after a brokerage switch or conversion
• Filter Marketing Exposed: Which 'Antimicrobial' and 'Ionizing' Claims Matter?